Journal PoliciesScope of the Journal
Peer review process
SCOPE OF THE JOURNAL
- The Journal of Professions and Organization aims to be the premier outlet for research on organizational issues concerning professionals, including their work, management and their broader social and economic role.
- We are particularly receptive to interdisciplinary perspectives and contributions, with strong interests in all professional organizations, professional service firms, and public sector professionals, including professionals in healthcare and nonprofit organizations.
- While recognizing the importance of traditional professions, we welcome work on new professions, occupations claiming some professional status, and on knowledge workers more generally.
- We welcome both qualitative and quantitative methods as well as innovative research utilizing new methodologies and analysis.
Authors should observe high standards with respect to publication ethics as set out by the Commission on Publication Ethics (COPE). Falsification or fabrication of data, plagiarism, including duplicate publication of the authors’ own work without proper citation, and misappropriation of the work are all unacceptable practices. Any cases of ethical misconduct are treated very seriously and will be dealt with in accordance with the COPE guidelines.
All authors should have been involved in the writing of the manuscript at draft and any revision stages, and have read and approved the final version. Anyone who made major contributions to the writing of the manuscript should be listed as an author (e.g. “ghost writing” is prohibited by the Journal). Any other individuals who made less substantive contributions to the study or the writing of the manuscript should be listed in the acknowledgement section. Any change in authorship (including author order) after the initial manuscript submission must be approved in writing by all authors.
Authorship and 'Umbrella' groups
Many large collaborative studies are organized under a group name which represents all the participants. All articles must have at least one named individual as author. Authors who wish to acknowledge the umbrella group from which the data originate should first list the author(s) of the article and follow this with 'on behalf of the GROUP NAME'. If necessary the names of the participants may be listed in the Acknowledgements section.
By submitting your manuscript to the journal it is understood that this it is an original manuscript and is unpublished work and is not under consideration elsewhere. Plagiarism, including duplicate publication of the author’s own work, in whole or in part without proper citation is not tolerated by the journal. Manuscripts submitted to the journal may be checked for originality using anti-plagiarism software.
Conflicts of interest
At the point of submission, each author should reveal any financial interests or connections, direct or indirect, or other situations that might raise the question of bias in the work reported or the conclusions, implications, or opinions stated – including pertinent commercial or other sources of funding for the individual author(s) or for the associated department(s) or organization(s), personal relationships, or direct academic competition. When considering whether you should declare a conflicting interest or connection please consider the conflict of interest test: Is there any arrangement that would embarrass you or any of your co-authors if it was to emerge after publication and you had not declared it?
PEER REVIEW PROCESS
All submissions to the journal are initially reviewed by one of the Editors. At this stage a manuscript may be rejected without peer review if it is judged to be too far from the journal’s zones of relevance and quality. This fast rejection process means that authors are given a quick decision and do not need to wait for the review process.
Manuscripts that are accepted into the review process are sent out for peer, double-blind review, usually to three independent reviewers. Based on the feedback from these reviewers and the Editors’ judgment a decision is given on the manuscript. Our policy at JPO is to provide authors with constructive feedback on their papers as fast as possible. We aim to issue first decisions within 9 weeks.
For information about this journal's policy, please visit our Author Self-Archiving policy page.
The opinions expressed in the Journal of Professions and Organization are those of the authors and contributors, and do not necessarily reflect those of the editors, the editorial board, Oxford University Press or the organization to which the authors are affiliated.